Those values look a bit surprising... I did not type them myself... It happens if you change the data type let's say from unsigned char to double...
But it's not a meaningless number: if you now type -1e1000 as a new minimum value, CVI 'corrects' it to -9.2E+18...
It also can behave properly, sometimes, but shouldn't it always? :smileywink:
It behaves better if instead of -1e1000 you first type -100. If you then enter -1e1000 it will correct the number to -1.0E+300
(well, it probably should be E+308...) but I'll better stop here :smileyvery-happy:
